Tag Archive for 'right'

Confessions Well

I must confess that necessary of love! That necessary of one I hug in cold nights and a cup of hot chocolate. That necessary of true smiles, of that we only know to take off of somebody. That necessary of histories and a kiss in the forehead before sleeping. That necessary of a company in one to put of the sun, to go up in a mountain and to feel the light breeze, to look at the horizon and to the side it can have somebody. I must confess that necessary of loving recadinhos, messages, and emails.

That necessary of affection, soft touchs, ludibriantes looks. That necessary of attention to speak of loves that I could not live, of looks that never I will forget, them my deeper desires. That necessary of a col pra to cry my hurts, my tensions, my fears. That necessary of a shoulder to agree me. to look at to the side and only to smile saying that I go to be well.

That necessary of kisses that if incase perfectly to mine. That necessary of somebody to divide the bizarros moments most complex and of my life. That to risk necessary me, to run, to smile, to jump, to play to amuse, me, to have insane people action, to have wild moments, to tan, to place all the kept energy pra are. I must admit that the solitude is cruel the times, even so makes in them to reflect to learn and to grow. But I must confess that nobody makes in them so happy, that nobody can cure a wound of what so well a true love. I must confess that I feel lack of you now!

Nery Decision

In this subject, the doctrine diverge regarding this species of assistants to directly be able to be reached by the sentencial decision, exactly not integrating the procedural relation. For the doutrinadores that defend this thesis, the justification if of on account of the similarity enters this type of assistant and the unitary facultative joint party, that exactly suffers the effect from the considered thing opting to not participating of the process. This is the agreement of Nelson Nery Jnior and Rosa Maria of Andrade 17 Nery, for example, and ours to see, most correct, in view of that, the two receive identical treatment procedural. Another question of great relevance in what it refers to the incidence of the thing judged on the assistants, says respect the possibility of the quarrel of ‘ ‘ justice of deciso’ ‘ after the res judicata. Art. 55 of the CPC affirm that ‘ ‘ transited in judged the sentence, in the cause where assistant intervined, this will not be able, in posterior process, to argue the justice of the decision, saved if to allege and to prove … ‘ ‘.

‘ ‘ One understands for justice of the decision the beddings in fact and of right of the sentence, that is, after the judged transit in of the sentence given in the process in which it intervined, the simple assistant will not be able more, in future process, to argue those facts that had been adopted by the judge as bedding of the decision for pronounced it. The doctrine, in its great majority, nominates this procedural phenomenon of effect of the intervention or effectiveness of assistncia’ ‘.